Get ready for a heated debate, folks! The world of college football is abuzz with the latest news from Texas Longhorns' head coach, Steve Sarkisian. In a bold move, Sarkisian has vowed to uphold the integrity of the College Football Playoff (CFP) selection criteria, specifically emphasizing the importance of strength of schedule.
But here's where it gets controversial... Sarkisian's team, despite an impressive 9-3 record, was left out of the CFP this season. He believes that playing tough non-conference opponents like Ohio State and Michigan should be rewarded, not penalized. In a media availability session, Sarkisian expressed his frustration with the CFP committee's apparent disregard for the principles they set forth.
"The CFP's first criterion is strength of schedule. We must honor these criteria," Sarkisian stated. He further added, "If we're not going to value strength of schedule, our non-conference scheduling will certainly change. We play in the SEC, and adding Ohio State and Michigan to our schedule is a bold move. We hope the committee recognizes that in the future."
And this is the part most people miss... Texas' decision to play these powerhouses was made before the SEC moved to nine conference games. So, it's not just about the record; it's about the quality of opponents and the willingness to take on tough challenges.
Sarkisian's team has a lot to prove in the upcoming Cheez-It Citrus Bowl against Michigan. A win would not only secure their third straight season with double-digit victories but also send a strong message to the CFP committee. With the CFP expanding to 12 teams, the criteria for selection are under scrutiny, and Sarkisian is leading the charge for change.
So, what do you think? Should strength of schedule be a primary factor in CFP selection? Or is it time to reconsider the entire evaluation process? Let's hear your thoughts in the comments!
